-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.5k
gh-137134: Update SQLite to 3.50.3 for binary releases #137135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
gh-137134: Update SQLite to 3.50.3 for binary releases #137135
Conversation
I believe I pushed the SQLite 3.50.3 sources to https://github.com/python/cpython-source-deps/releases/tag/sqlite-3.50.3.0 properly. |
I've added builds of this version to https://github.com/beeware/cpython-android-source-deps. |
!buildbot android |
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @mhsmith for commit c69125d 🤖 Results will be shown at: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F137135%2Fmerge The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: The builders matched are:
|
Somehow the Oh, except that both branch from the |
I don't think this matters? at least not any more so than it not mattering the past few updates? All the sqlite- tags since that 3.45.3.0 one are in a similar state. I think this is due to people using a fork to push to initially? the commits "don't appear in this repository" which I think is GH for they're identified as being in a fork's repo? (GH repos are a unified hash namespace across all forks) A little confusing to me how github manages such a weird state of a tag in a repo who's commit claims not to be. in my own fork i probably re-pushed my branch after fixing the commit signing after getting that setup in order to follow the instructions that wanted a signed tag. (my tag was signed regardless) |
Draft mode as this PR is probably only a start at the moment. I expect I've missed some bits and I think we need the macOS, Windows, and Android release builders to weigh in and confirm stuff works.
Two separate news entries per platform is odd, Android didn't get a news mention - we might want to rethink our categories for this kind of update? I was mirroring what I saw done for the 3.49.1 update.