Skip to content

Conversation

@DevelopmentCats
Copy link
Contributor

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats commented Dec 4, 2025

This pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow, code-review.yaml, to automate AI-powered code review for pull requests. The workflow creates a Coder Task that uses an AI agent to analyze PR changes, review code quality, identify issues, and post committable suggestions directly on the PR. The workflow can be triggered by adding the "code-review" label or via manual dispatch.

Key additions and features:

AI-Powered Code Review Workflow

  • Introduces .github/workflows/code-review.yaml, a comprehensive workflow that triggers on PR labeling or manual dispatch to initiate an AI-driven code review using Coder Tasks.
  • The workflow includes steps to determine PR context, extract repository info, build a detailed code review prompt with clear instructions and examples, and submit the review as inline suggestions using GitHub's native suggestion syntax.

This comment was marked as duplicate.

DevelopmentCats

This comment was marked as duplicate.

DevelopmentCats

This comment was marked as outdated.

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats added the doc-check Assign this label to PRs to check for any doc changes. label Dec 4, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Code Review

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow for AI-powered code reviews using Coder Tasks. The workflow triggers on the "code-review" label and creates a task that analyzes PRs and posts inline suggestions.

Found: 0 issues

Looks good - The workflow follows existing patterns from doc-check.yaml, includes proper error handling with set -euo pipefail, validates inputs appropriately, and uses correct security practices. The implementation is consistent with the codebase standards.


AI review via Coder Tasks

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Code Review

Reviewed GitHub Actions workflow for AI code review.

Found 1 issue (1 portability nitpick) - see inline suggestion for fix.

The workflow follows good patterns from doc-check.yaml with proper error handling, validation, and permissions. The only issue is using GNU-specific grep syntax.


AI review via Coder Tasks

DevelopmentCats

This comment was marked as outdated.

DevelopmentCats

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Code Review

Reviewed GitHub Actions workflow for code review automation.

Looks good - no production issues found.

This workflow improves upon the existing doc-check.yaml pattern by:

  • Including proper URL validation for workflow_dispatch inputs (lines 78-83)
  • Using portable sed instead of GNU-specific grep -oP for URL parsing (line 90)
  • Including set -euo pipefail for proper error handling (line 62)

The workflow correctly handles secrets, validates inputs, and follows GitHub Actions security best practices.


AI review via Coder Tasks

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Code Review

Reviewed AI code review workflow implementation.

Found 3 issues (2 critical, 1 nitpick).


AI review via Coder Tasks

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Code Review

Reviewed AI code review workflow implementation.

Looks good - no production-breaking issues found.


AI review via Coder Tasks

Copy link
Collaborator

@david-fraley david-fraley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

stamping approval

@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats changed the title feat: add code-review task (initial commit) (testing) feat: add code-review workflow task Dec 12, 2025
@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats merged commit 76bfcc7 into main Dec 12, 2025
38 checks passed
@DevelopmentCats DevelopmentCats deleted the cat/code-review-task branch December 12, 2025 16:11
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

code-review doc-check Assign this label to PRs to check for any doc changes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants