Skip to content

Add FO Council proposed edits #84

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
nigelmegitt merged 3 commits into from
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Add FO Council proposed edits #84

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
85d06f1
Add FO Council proposed edits
nigelmegitt Nov 25, 2022
7860cb0
Change MAY to may in example
nigelmegitt Dec 5, 2022
2ba8ed2
Remove "producing" from "content implementation"
nigelmegitt Dec 8, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions index.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -298,10 +298,12 @@ <h3>Requirements for advancing the maturity level of features</h3>
its implementability has been demonstrated.</p>
<p>When considering suitability to advance any feature beyond
Candidate Recommendation, at least two independent factors of verification
MUST be demonstrated, which may come from any of:</p>
for each normative requirement
MUST be demonstrated, which may come, as relevant for that requirement,
from any of:</p>
<ul>
<li>Presentation implementation</li>
<li>Content</li>
<li>Content producing implementation</li>
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt Nov 25, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion from the TTWG call 2022-11-25 that an acceptable alternative would be "Content implementation" - @rhiaro please could you confirm if this it the case?

Copy link
Member

@hober hober Nov 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Content implementation" strikes me as ambiguous—it could be interpreted to include hand-written content, which AIUI the council was trying to prevent with the proposed wording.

Copy link
Contributor

@palemieux palemieux Nov 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code is hand-written as well. I am not sure what distinction you are trying to make.

Copy link
Member

@hober hober Dec 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(to be clear, my above comment, and this, are with my Apple AC rep hat on, and no other.)

@palemieux the distinction is that a piece of code that generates content would count but human-written content would not. I'm unsure how to be more clear.

Copy link
Member

@rhiaro rhiaro Dec 3, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hober I'd discussed with the WG on a call on 11/24 that "content implementation" would mean content produced by some form of authoring tool in their context, so including the word "producing" in here wouldn't be necessary. Are you okay with that?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt Dec 8, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going to go ahead and assume silence is assent, and remove the word "producing".

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt Dec 8, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in 2ba8ed2.

Copy link
Member

@hober hober Dec 9, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going to go ahead and assume silence is assent, and remove the word "producing".

No, silence just means I didn't see the ping in my firehose of GitHub notifications.

I still think "content implementation" is too ambiguous.

<li>Validating implementation</li>
</ul>
<p>For example, a feature MAY be advanced beyond Candidate Recommendation
Expand Down