Wasm-friendly implementation of varargs. #5215
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For JavaScript, using Scala arrays wrapped in
WrappedArray
(2.12) orArraySeq
(2.13) is not ideal for performance. Instead, since about forever, we have re-emitted them as JS arrays wrapped in our ownjs.WrappedArray
/WrappedVarArgs
. This, however, has poor performance on Wasm.We now call generic methods to choose the best implementation of a varargs Seq, depending on the platform. They take Scala arrays, and "convert" them to JS arrays if necessary. The conversions are intrinsified so that they are zero-cost.
For this to work, we add an
InlineArrayReplacement
in the optimizer, similar to the existingInlineJSArrayReplacement
.