Skip to content

Conversation

@masking0165-jpg
Copy link

@masking0165-jpg masking0165-jpg commented Dec 5, 2025

Type of Change

  • New Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Documentation
  • Performance Improvement
  • Test/CI
  • Refactor
  • Other:

Related Issues

Summary of Changes

Checklist

  • I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
  • Passed make pre-commit
  • Added/updated necessary tests
  • Documentation updated (if needed)
  • CI/CD passed (if applicable)

Impact

  • Breaking change (compatibility)
  • Requires doc/config/deployment update
  • Other impact:

Additional Notes


Thank you for your contribution! Please ensure your PR follows the community standards (CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) and sign the CLA if this is your first contribution.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 5, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@majinghe
Copy link
Contributor

majinghe commented Dec 6, 2025

@masking0165-jpg What's propose for this change?

@majinghe
Copy link
Contributor

majinghe commented Dec 8, 2025

@masking0165-jpg Any update here, otherwise we will close this PR, we don't know what your change means.

clock.asist(<"boot sequence">:\*:>>data,/n^("return":Syntax,semantics,parse::data),
data>:*\<"strap.binary">=(Syntax,semantics,parse);
clause{
auto.parse="data";
{
return(value("./"));
        int i=(strings(Syntax,semantics,"parse::data: \n_..));
Value=(serial<<data<<i++..);
Data==<"boot sequence:("./")">;
auto push:
clause=strap.gen<"data:">;
auto.enum.(boot:%c\n,(auto.parse==("./"data));
boot:
    repeat(run:
           automation);

@masking0165-jpg
Copy link
Author

@masking0165-jpg What's propose for this change?
Applications

@masking0165-jpg Any update here, otherwise we will close this PR, we don't know what your change means.

It asist to regenerate from split sequence back to executables....preventing an code interuptas from extern..

@masking0165-jpg
Copy link
Author

Please edit and update your possible way to commit as it tested in my end.

@majinghe
Copy link
Contributor

majinghe commented Dec 9, 2025

@masking0165-jpg After evaluation, we think the change code in this PR do not follow our code guidance, and has no possibility of improving the security and performance for our ci. Thanks for your contribution. If you have other idea to secure our GitHub action, new PR is welcomed, otherwise, we will close this PR later. Thanks.

@masking0165-jpg
Copy link
Author

@masking0165-jpg After evaluation, we think the change code in this PR do not follow our code guidance, and has no possibility of improving the security and performance for our ci. Thanks for your contribution. If you have other idea to secure our GitHub action, new PR is welcomed, otherwise, we will close this PR later. Thanks.

Wait..I have another pull request to create...

clause=strap.gen<"data:">;
auto.enum.(boot:%c,\n,(auto.parse==("./data"));
[boot
[run
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed before, we don't have a clear understanding of this part code for gitHub action. We will not accept this part of code.

Copy link
Contributor

@majinghe majinghe Dec 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@masking0165-jpg we really don't know the purpose for the below part of code

tolink.syncbuffer=log<device>
Device=log.device
log.device=[device.enum];
{
If
Log<device>=init.device;
Log.enum="true";
Remote.enum="true";
Log.enum!==("remote".[device.enum]);
Reges.enum=("native"(clone.§((ip:device<mac::));
Reges.clone=§(ip[host]:device<mac*:"ip[native]");
(optional=remote.user("name,number,symbol,contact"));
Init.dDevice<//path/n>;
  }
}
import{readFilesync,writeFilesync,existsync,globesync};
from "node:fs";
import{dirname,join}from"node:path";
clock.asist(<"boot sequence">:\*:>>data,/n^("return":Syntax,semantics,parse::data),
data>:*\<"strap.binary">=(Syntax,semantics,parse);
clause{
auto.parse="data";
{
return(value("./data"));
{
clause=strap.gen<(strings(Syntax,semantics,"parse::data:_\n);
Value=(serial<<data<<i++..);
data==<"boot.sequence:("./")">;
auto push
clause=strap.gen<"data:">;
auto.enum.(boot:%c,\n,(auto.parse==("./data"));
[boot
  [run

Could you please have a explanation to let team have a better understanding?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants