-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Initial ruby/rubygems governance doc
#9187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
schneems
wants to merge
4
commits into
ruby:master
Choose a base branch
from
schneems:schneems/governance-v1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+96
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This provides a starting point for a Governance doc. It attempts to: - Document the current state of norms with regard to Matz and Ruby core. - Present a well-defined boundary between Ruby Central (RC) and the technical management of the `ruby/rubygems` repository. This is achieved by separating administrative access (ability) from decision-making capability. Under this model, Ruby Central would need to work through a core team (via norms/communication) for permanent changes. - Establish an explicit security team that can make swift decisions regarding access and threats. For example, if Ruby Central believed there was an active threat, they would need the buy-in from the security team to temporarily remove someone and the buy-in from the core team to permanently remove someone. - Tighten norms around commit access and "active" status. While it's common for some Ruby open-source projects to have inactive members for many years, this project has a very large surface area that affects all Ruby users and the RubyGems.org service. I am seeking a stricter set of norms. Commit access can be a point of pride and identity for developers; to that end, I'm suggesting adopting a way to memorialize that status via an "alumni" status. - Separate development from release capability. This document was reviewed and approved by the RC board. It was previously shared privately for feedback with Ruby core contributors (specifically, @hsbt, who is listed as the Ruby integrator of RubyGems) and with a maintainer of `ruby/rubygems` @colby-swandale, who had commit access prior to the repo being moved from `rubygems/rubygems` and has commit access now. I've also reached out to several of the other former paid maintainers from the [group of six](https://github.com/gem-coop) who identify themselves as "the maintainers." The ones I spoke to expressed that they're unhappy with the communication and how events unfolded, and don't wish to work for or with RC. They're not willing to accept access as it's been offered. I understand that they've moved on to gem-coop and spinel-coop. - This document is intended to be provisional, with an explicit mandate to replace and re-draft governance written in the doc.
mghaught
reviewed
Dec 12, 2025
paracycle
reviewed
Dec 12, 2025
Contributor
|
@schneems who, exactly, did you reach out to? Since you did not reach out to me, I do not want to be included in your summary of "the group". |
kou
reviewed
Dec 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This provides a starting point for a Governance doc. It attempts to:
ruby/rubygemsrepository. This is achieved by separating administrative access (ability) from decision-making capability. Under this model, Ruby Central would need to work through a core team (via norms/communication) for permanent changes.This document was reviewed and approved by the RC board. It was previously shared privately for feedback with Ruby core contributors (specifically, @hsbt, who is listed as the Ruby integrator of RubyGems) and with a maintainer of
ruby/rubygems@colby-swandale, who had commit access prior to the repo being moved fromrubygems/rubygemsand has commit access now.I've also reached out to several of the group of six who identify themselves as "the maintainers." The ones I spoke to expressed that they're unhappy with the communication and how events unfolded, and don't wish to work for or with RC. They're not willing to accept access as it's been offered. I understand that they've moved on to gem-coop and spinel-coop.