Skip to content

[3.13] gh-132898: Add a note in multiprocessing.Process docs about creating a process in a REPL (GH-137118) #137155

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2025

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 27, 2025

  • Reword, expand, and clarify the limitation, highlighting the REPL case.
  • Mention in the high level Process description.
  • added a pointer to the GH issue from the doc note

(cherry picked from commit 4e40f2b)

Co-authored-by: Duprat yduprat@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith greg@krypto.org


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--137155.org.readthedocs.build/

…reating a process in a REPL (pythonGH-137118)

* Reword, expand, and clarify the limitation, highlighting the REPL case.
* Mention in the high level Process description.
* added a pointer to the GH issue from the doc note

---------
(cherry picked from commit 4e40f2b)

Co-authored-by: Duprat <yduprat@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
@gpshead gpshead enabled auto-merge (squash) July 27, 2025 20:01
@gpshead gpshead merged commit f867711 into python:3.13 Jul 27, 2025
29 of 30 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRs Jul 27, 2025
@brianschubert
Copy link
Member

docs build failed with undefined label: 'multiprocessing-programming-spawn'. That label was added in #128173, which wasn't backported to 3.13. I opened #137156 to add the labels to the 3.13 docs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants