coverage: 63.725% (+0.02%) from 63.702%
when pulling 7c12090 on Sharpz7:baremetal-ci-fixes
into f98c2f9 on gophercloud:main.

@stephenfin - I think this code is really old. I could totally search through now and find exactly where noauth/httpbasic was broken, but since v1 is functional and correctly uses auth (, I think this is okay to merge? (When master is fixed?)

@stephenfin - I think this code is really old. I could totally search through now and find exactly where noauth/httpbasic was broken, but since v1 is functional and correctly uses auth (, I think this is okay to merge? (When master is fixed?)

Sorry, I don't understand the ask here. The CI is still failing: we hardly want to merge this as-is?

@stephenfin - I think this code is really old. I could totally search through now and find exactly where noauth/httpbasic was broken, but since v1 is functional and correctly uses auth (, I think this is okay to merge? (When master is fixed?)

Sorry, I don't understand the ask here. The CI is still failing: we hardly want to merge this as-is?

Sorry, this PR currently has a typo... I'm going to fix it today and it'll pass.

I only figured out the master issue with blind luck on a different change.

My suspicion as to what is happening with the tests is they were designed before the devstack action was created (The README suggests this was the case in the acceptance test folder?), and these configurations are designed to be skipped.

I mean... we can totally spin up 3 ironics but that seems insane. (I think that is what would be needed to stop the skips?)

I don't think we can deploy master on Ubuntu 22.04: it's not a supported runtime for 2025.2 (Flamingo). While it gets things passing right now, there's a good chance this will break at some point in the near future as DevStack removes/inadvertently breaks support for Focal.

TBH, I suspect the issue here is the Ironic's devstack plugin. We must be going off the beaten track wrt what Ironic does in their CI. My guess is that it's something to do with the networking configuration (perhaps use of OVN in one place and OVS in another). Would you be able to compare the local.conf we use versus those used in the upstream Ironic gates to see if there are any obvious differences? I will do so at some point myself if not, but it's just a case of finding the time.

I can get on that - thank you!

Thanks.

Just a case in point RE: Focal vs Noble: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/952839