-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Revert "Update CI auto-format" #6236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "Update CI auto-format" #6236
Conversation
This reverts commit 377151a.
WalkthroughThe PR removes the automatic formatting GitHub Actions workflow and instead integrates rustfmt formatting checks into the main CI lint job, shifting from automatic code formatting with commits to explicit formatting verification during continuous integration. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (4)📓 Common learnings📚 Learning: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971ZApplied to files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
youknowone
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no problem, let's try again
Reverts #6233
@youknowone this workflow failed deeply sorry as i am new to github actions and still in learning phase.
i created a fix which tested on my fork where i used another account to fork my fork so i can make pr to my fork then test it . This works currently.
what wrong in our previous approach is that we made a workflow which dont have any context of pr and dont have PAT so it failed .
Summary by CodeRabbit