-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Add sorted.py to microbenchmarks #6086
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| from random import random, seed | ||
| seed(0) | ||
|
|
||
| unsorted_list = [random() for _ in range(5 * ITERATIONS)] | ||
|
|
||
| # --- | ||
|
|
||
| # Setup code only runs once so do not modify in-place | ||
| sorted(unsorted_list) |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify accuracy: does the harness invoke benchmarks exactly 5 times?
The microbenchmark example uses 5 * ITERATIONS in its own code, but the harness’s number of invocations may differ. Past learnings note ITERATIONS is injected at runtime, not the exact repeat count. Please confirm before locking this to “5 times.” If uncertain, prefer “multiple times.”
Proposed wording if needed:
Run this script to locate the harness logic that sets ITERATIONS and confirm the count/values:
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 9032
Clarify README: harness invokes benchmarks multiple times, not exactly five
Verified by inspecting
benches/microbenchmarks.rsthat there is no hard-coded “5” invocations—ITERATIONSis injected for each run based on Criterion’s input values, and the harness loops over a range of iteration counts rather than invoking exactly five times.Please update
benches/README.mdaccordingly:Relevant implementation details:
benches/microbenchmarks.rs, the harness checks forITERATIONSin each benchmark and injects it (lines ~65–67), but does not fix the count at five.BenchmarkGroupthen runs the benchmark for each input value, driving multiple invocations rather than exactly five.📝 Committable suggestion
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~50-~50: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...rence a variable called
ITERATIONS. If present then the benchmark code will be ...(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~51-~51: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...et to a value between 100 and 1,000. For example: ```python obj = [i for i in ra...
(QB_NEW_EN)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents