Update `test_enumerate.py` from 3.13.5 #6032

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Merged

youknowone merged 1 commit into RustPython:main from ShaharNaveh:update-enumerate

Jul 25, 2025

Contributor

ShaharNaveh commented Jul 24, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

Refactor
- Updated internal naming for enumerate functionality to improve clarity. No changes to user-facing behavior or features.

Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Walkthrough

The changes involve renaming the internal field and related argument names in the PyEnumerate struct and its constructor from iterator to iterable within the vm/src/builtins/enumerate.rs file. All references and usages of the old name have been updated accordingly, without altering any logic or behavior.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
vm/src/builtins/enumerate.rs	Renamed `iterator` field and related arguments to `iterable` in `PyEnumerate` and `EnumerateArgs` structs, and updated all references in methods and constructors.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A field once called "iterator"
Now "iterable" in nomenclature.
With every hop, names align,
Code is tidy, simply fine.
Renamed with care, not a byte misplaced—
This bunny’s work is neatly traced! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96f47a4 and 5aa075c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

Lib/test/test_enumerate.py is excluded by !Lib/**

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

vm/src/builtins/enumerate.rs (5 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.rs: Follow the default rustfmt code style (cargo fmt to format)
Always run clippy to lint code (cargo clippy) before completing tasks. Fix any warnings or lints that are introduced by your changes
Follow Rust best practices for error handling and memory management
Use the macro system (pyclass, pymodule, pyfunction, etc.) when implementing Python functionality in Rust

Files:

vm/src/builtins/enumerate.rs

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)

GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (macos-latest)
GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (windows-latest)
GitHub Check: Check Rust code with rustfmt and clippy
GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (ubuntu-latest)
GitHub Check: Check the WASM package and demo
GitHub Check: Run rust tests (ubuntu-latest)
GitHub Check: Run rust tests (windows-latest)
GitHub Check: Run rust tests (macos-latest)
GitHub Check: Run tests under miri
GitHub Check: Ensure compilation on various targets
GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests on wasm-wasi

🔇 Additional comments (6)

vm/src/builtins/enumerate.rs (6)

22-22: LGTM! Semantic improvement in field naming.

The rename from iterator to iterable better reflects the semantic meaning - this field represents an iterable object that can produce an iterator, not necessarily an iterator itself.

34-35: Consistent naming update in constructor arguments.

The field rename maintains consistency with the PyEnumerate struct and preserves the same argument handling behavior.

45-45: Correct parameter destructuring update.

The constructor parameter destructuring correctly reflects the renamed field in EnumerateArgs.

51-51: Proper field initialization with renamed parameter.

The struct initialization correctly uses the renamed iterable field, maintaining consistency throughout the constructor.

72-72: Updated field access in serialization method.

The __reduce__ method correctly accesses the renamed iterable field for object serialization, preserving the same functionality.

81-81: Core iterator functionality updated correctly.

The next method properly accesses the renamed iterable field, maintaining the same enumeration behavior while using the more semantically accurate field name.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Explain this complex logic.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai explain this code block.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
@coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
@coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.


          Update test_enumerate.py from 3.13.5

5aa075c

ShaharNaveh force-pushed the update-enumerate branch from 3137105 to 5aa075c Compare

July 24, 2025 21:18

ShaharNaveh marked this pull request as ready for review

July 24, 2025 21:19

youknowone approved these changes

View reviewed changes

youknowone merged commit b733636 into RustPython:main

12 checks passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet