Skip to content

Add "take" comment command #5932

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2025

Conversation

ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh commented Jul 10, 2025

closes #5926

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced automatic issue assignment when a user comments "take" on an issue. The issue will be assigned to the commenter.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow named "Comment Commands" has been added. It listens for new comments on issues and, if the comment body is exactly "take", automatically assigns the commenter to the issue using the GitHub CLI. The workflow ensures only one assignment per user at a time.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/comment-commands.yml Added new workflow to assign issue to commenter if comment is "take"; uses GitHub CLI and concurrency.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant Workflow

    User->>GitHub: Comment "take" on issue
    GitHub->>Workflow: Trigger workflow on issue_comment.created
    Workflow->>GitHub: Assign issue to commenter via gh CLI
    GitHub-->>User: Issue assigned to commenter
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement workflow to assign issue to commenter on "take" comment (#5926)
Restrict assignment to issues, not PRs (#5926)
Use concurrency to avoid race conditions (#5926)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes found.

Poem

A bunny hops with nimble grace,
Assigning issues in their place.
Comment "take"—the magic word,
And soon your name is swiftly heard.
With workflows neat and actions bright,
The warren’s tasks are set just right!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/comment-commands.yml (2)

15-17: Remove trailing whitespace to satisfy YAML linters
Line 16 has superfluous spaces after write, flagged by yamllint.

-      issues: write    
+      issues: write

12-14: Explicitly set cancel-in-progress in concurrency block
Without it, multiple “take” comments from the same user queue up instead of replacing the previous run. If you intend to keep only the latest, add:

concurrency:
  group: ${{ github.actor }}-issue-assign
  cancel-in-progress: true
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c4c636 and 860ce36.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/comment-commands.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/comment-commands.yml

[error] 16-16: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests on wasm-wasi
  • GitHub Check: Check the WASM package and demo
  • GitHub Check: Run tests under miri
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Check Rust code with rustfmt and clippy
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Ensure compilation on various targets
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/comment-commands.yml (1)

9-9: Make the body check more robust (trim / case-insensitive)
The match github.event.comment.body == 'take' fails if the user types “Take”, “take \n”, etc.
Consider normalising the string:

-    if: (!github.event.issue.pull_request) && github.event.comment.body == 'take'
+    if: |
+      (!github.event.issue.pull_request) &&
+      contains(toJson(github.event.comment.body), '"take"')

(or use startsWith() / contains() as preferred).

@youknowone
Copy link
Member

youknowone commented Jul 10, 2025

take

ok, PR is excluded 😅

Copy link
Member

@youknowone youknowone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@youknowone youknowone merged commit b2013cd into RustPython:main Jul 10, 2025
12 checks passed
@ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Contributor Author

take

ok, PR is excluded 😅

PRs are excluded, and this will only work after merging to main:)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support issue self assigned worflow
2 participants