Skip to main content

Questions tagged [interactive-proof-systems]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
5 votes
1 answer
219 views

The book Arora and Barak defines class IP (interactive protocol) by making the verifier have private coins. Before proceeding to public coin proofs and showing they are the "same," the book ...
advocateofnone's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
123 views

I am looking for an interactive proof for the language $AUTO^C= \{𝐺∣\text{𝐺 is an undirected graph that has no non-trivial automorphisms} \}$. I am interested in a method similar to the interactive ...
user171912's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
56 views

I am looking for some greatest references that could help me understand the theorem $MIP^* = RE$ ($MIP*=RE$) step by step. The paper (The Connes Embedding Problem: A guided tour) covers various ...
Kadi Harouna Illia's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
75 views

It is well-known that $\mathsf{MIP} = \mathsf{NEXPTIME}$, and recently there was a breakthrough stating that $\mathsf{MIP^*} = \mathsf{RE}$. This was very confusing because it seemed like the (...
Dannyu NDos's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
273 views

There is an extremely standard proof that IP⊆PSPACE, used for instance here, here, or here, by the argument that the full protocol is max-avg game tree that can be evaluated in polynomial space. It's ...
Alex Meiburg's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
102 views

I've read this scribe that provides a public coin interactive proof for graph non-isomorphism. In the proof, the verifier samples both a pairwise-independent hash function and a target $y$. Then it ...
AmirD's user avatar
  • 13
0 votes
1 answer
107 views

I am going through Justin Thaler's book - https://people.cs.georgetown.edu/jthaler/ProofsArgsAndZK.pdf - "Proofs, Arguments, and Zero-Knowledge" He is describing the Sumcheck Protocol on ...
user93353's user avatar
  • 125
2 votes
0 answers
187 views

I was trying to understand the proof of MIP is inside NEXP. I was referring to Rutger's university scribes (link). They define MIP as a class with exponential proof, but that is not the definition I ...
Zee's user avatar
  • 243
1 vote
1 answer
71 views

I was watching a talk by Anand Natarajan on $\text{NEEXP} \subseteq \text{MIP*}$, and he uses $\text{3-coloring}$ as an example problem for $\text{NEXP} = \text{MIP}$ (timestamp 3:50). He mentioned ...
Zee's user avatar
  • 243
0 votes
1 answer
225 views

I heard the terms "theorem provers" and "proof assistants" tossed around before (which I assumed to be the same up until a couple seconds ago), and also of Coq, Idris, Agda, TLA+ (...
toraritte's user avatar
  • 105
2 votes
1 answer
101 views

In the class $IP$ we have a probabilistic polytime verifier which interacts with a nondeterministic prover polynomial times and all the messages are of length polynomial of the input. We can think of ...
Sassy Math's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
76 views

The celebrated proof that IP = PSPACE relies on an interactive proof for the QBF problem. Is there any other "natural" interactive proof for a PSPACE-hard problem other than QBF? (of course, ...
Charles Bouillaguet's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
90 views

I learned years ago that $IP \subseteq PSPACE$ since you could simulate all sets of messages and then determine the probability of success. But lately I’ve been looking at the standard proof of this ...
SAS's user avatar
  • 53
1 vote
1 answer
189 views

In a 2015 Quanta article talking about a breakthrough in the graph isomorphism problem, it was mentioned that graph isomorphism has a unique property where we have an interactive proof protocol for it....
user918212's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
99 views

I am wondering if anyone knows if there are any NP-complete problems that are also known to be in IP (interactive polynomial time). I know problems like Graph Isomorphism are in IP, but such problems ...
user918212's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5