Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Cancel
4
  • $\begingroup$ It sounds problematic, but can you clarify? Do you want month as a fixed effect as in each unique month is different (i.e. Jan 2023 and Jan 2024 are different levels?) Or do you want month identity as the fixed effect? The second might be possible, but it's likely still problematic since you only have 2 years. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 10, 2024 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ @JacobWeverka What’s “month identity” mean? I’m just curious. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 10, 2024 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ As in all measurements from January of any year being grouped vs Jan 2023 vs Jan 2024 as different groups. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 10, 2024 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ @JacobWeverka thanks for the answer! My initial idea was month identity (so any January is the same, be it 2023 or 2024) but now I am thinking of including a fixed effects for each unique month (so same month in different years is different) and removing the control variable with monthly frequency. I just wonder if that is a good idea, since I am basically ignoring some information that I have available. If I choose the unique month effects, does that control for the omitted variable, given that it is has the same frequency? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 11, 2024 at 8:47