Timeline for Why is "Papist" a derogatory term?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 hours ago | vote | accept | Dark Malthorp | ||
| 17 hours ago | answer | added | Ken Graham♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| 19 hours ago | comment | added | gidds | (One way to distinguish is to use capital-C ‘Catholic’ for the Roman church and those in communion with it, and small-c ‘catholic’ for the more general term as used in the Nicene Creed etc. But that could be easy to miss in print, and clumsy to make in speech.) | |
| 22 hours ago | history | became hot network question | |||
| yesterday | history | edited | Dark Malthorp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 197 characters in body
|
| yesterday | comment | added | Dark Malthorp | That's a good point. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Mike Borden | I have heard it said that the term 'Christian' was originally (Acts 11:26) a term of derision. christianity.stackexchange.com/q/56043/47250 So maybe there are two questions here: Why is Papist used in derision? and Why is Papist received as derision? | |
| yesterday | answer | added | Ray Butterworth | timeline score: 4 | |
| yesterday | history | asked | Dark Malthorp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |