Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Cancel
10
  • 7
    There is, but you need to put a summary for the edited summary edit, and that summary itself can't be edited. Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:09
  • There was a Meta post long ago about how this behavior opened up an avenue for abuse. Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:11
  • @JNK Yes, you must have been inspired by the last bit that I added to the question even before I was. Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:12
  • @jonsca - just picked up on the inherent humor in trying to edit an edit Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:13
  • @Popular Yes, I could understand that. The entire editing system requires quite a bit of trust as it is, though. I promise I won't change all of my summaries to read "Pi11s 4 fr33" :) Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:14
  • Not sure if this was it, but if it's not, it's similar: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/18110/… Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:18
  • 1
    @Popular I wasn't aware of that, but I'm just suggesting a Edit Summary next to the Link|Source|Edit. I guess you could hide that button from anyone but the current editor. Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:21
  • Oh, I know, I wasn't trying to say that your request was good/bad/duplicative. It just reminded me, that's all. Commented Jun 29, 2011 at 20:29
  • Feature request to change this: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/79180/… Commented May 11, 2016 at 0:48
  • another feature request : meta.stackexchange.com/questions/289244/… Commented Jan 4, 2017 at 0:54